Early adopters certainly focused on using ATT&CK for glamorous use cases like Threat Intelligence and Adversary Emulation. Conducting gap analysis with ATT&CK to prioritize engineering efforts is a high-return effort for you and your organization. It’s my favorite of the use cases because it can help any organization! Before the availability of CTI for everyone, many gap assessments conducted by organizations without dedicated threat intelligence teams. The only means available were often based on notional system architectures driven by market trends or vendor pressures. You may have experienced this yourselves – and you may have mountains of shelf-ware purchased in response to the latest fad. By leveraging CTI from frameworks like ATT&CK, you can now ensure that every defensive measure you take provides actual value in countering the threat actors and techniques that are likely to target you.
Continue readingTag: SOC (Page 2 of 3)
As we saw in our last post, Threat Intelligence is a huge focus. But what good does intelligence do if we never act on it? If your organization is leveraging a SIEM or XDR, or using tools that allow for custom detection content to be added, then you use detection and analytics. ATT&CK includes data on detection and mitigation techniques, which presents you with sound guidance on where to start detecting each technique’s use in your environments. These underappreciated features of the ATT&CK database are fantastic in guiding all manner of blue team operators, and they provide a jump start to achieving greater security. Detection (or what they now call Data sources) and Mitigations give us homework. Before we can act, we must see – so let’s see how ATT&CK can help with Detection.
Continue readingAs you saw in the previous post, ATT&CK is loaded with potential to hit a lot of use cases. Most CTI organizations are at least considering the use of ATT&CK to structure their reports and feeds. It provides analysts with a common language and structure. ATT&CK fosters better collaboration and easier consumption of the findings for all, including you and your tools.
If you’ve known me for a while, you know I love talking about MITRE’s ATT&CK (Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge). I probably have an unhealthy addiction to discussing it, but I do think it is helpful to understand why it is both cool and has limits. So let’s discuss!
Continue readingIf you are landing here after reading earlier posts, you might be thinking “this is great, but what I REALLY need is to avoid being the next <insert bad breach company here>. Well, our friends at OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) are an organization that focuses on improving the security of software. Like any good David Letterman fan, they are famous for their Top 10 list of web application threats, and have followed that up with an API version! Threat modeling for software applications are essential not only to the end customers, but with the sheer complexity of today’s typical environments, the legal ramifications of a breach or attack can spell disaster for the hosting company, the software vendor, business partners, ecosystem partners, and the end users alike. It should be no surprise then that OWASP has its own approach to application threat modeling.
Continue reading