Tag: Threat Modeling (Page 2 of 5)

Most adversaries have a plan. Those plans vary greatly – in both complexity and rigor – from actor to actor, target to target. As we’ve discussed in prior posts, adversary plans are usually built from repeatable procedures – techniques and sub-techniques. The power of MITRE’s ATT&CK, CAPEC, or LMCO Kill Chain is that they help us track behaviors. Most of the time, I see organizations rush to address techniques through either detection & visibility or through protection. I think we all could use a dash of prevention – not just policy, but waaaay out front. We need to make even the selection of the plan difficult, and to reveal so little that the bad guys struggle to select the right plans. So let’s talk about making the recon phase hard for the adversary!

Happy Monday folks! I’m super excited to be getting back to it and blogging about some cybersecurity goodness. I’ve picked up a ton of cool ideas after a long but fantastic week in Amsterdam for Cisco Live Europe. Once again, my buddy Mark Stephens and I presented an Interactive Breakout called “Empty Threats – Building Your Own Cyber Threat Picture”. Offered at the last 4 Cisco Live US and Amsterdam events, each is a goldmine. What I love about these sessions is that our customers teach us so much about how they tackle security problems. Last week’s iteration did not disappoint. We had a fantastic discussion around using ATT&CK for insider threats. An attendee named Tommy brought up the question of how we factor them in, weigh their TTPs, etc. As with so many of these interactions, I am now thinking a lot about how to carry that forward. Let’s see how we might tackle this thorny topic!